Throughout the semester, Trump has been the sole person that
our conversation has always returned to, and I don’t think that’s unreasonable.
Trump is a perfect example of intolerance and illiberal speech. He’s racist,
misogynistic, and has the maturity of a 6th grader. But, apparently,
that is exactly what some Americans believe will make a perfect combination for
the presidential office. So how do we react to Trump? How do we react to his
supporters?
I think
the way to respond to Trump is with rationality. Trump is an entertainer, and
he thrives off of the attention that saying outlandish things gets him. Before
this course, I probably would have advocated for Trump’s speech to be
prohibited and silenced. However, I now recognize that Trump has a right to speak.
I don’t think that it does good to laugh or ridicule him though. It seems that
when people make fun of Trump, his supporters feel more attached to him. Making
fun of Trump makes him look like he is being attacked for his ideas, and Trump
supporters like to think that he is the victim. I have an acquaintance that
said verbatim “The media makes him look so much worse than he is in person.”
Attacking Trump seems to make him more likeable as a candidate, so I would
refrain from that. However, we also cannot attack Trump supporters. My
experience with Trump supporters is that the moment you question why they have
chosen to support him they immediately think that you are attacking their right
to believe whatever they want. They snarl something about being a “rotten
liberal” and don’t actually answer the question. So there might not be a
“right” way to talk to Trump supporters. I think that the best thing you can do
is to just appeal to rationality. Don’t try to insult them; don’t act like
you’re better than. Just ask simple questions in a non-threatening manner
(which is extremely ironic considering most Trump supporters like to talk about
how today’s younger generation is made up of pussies). Trump supporters should
be questioned about policy, and the practicality of any of his current policies
actually being enacted rather than repeating his sensationalized claims. Trump
has the right to continue his hateful speech, but, like Cicero would say, it is
the American population’s job to see through his claims and ask about his
actual policy suggestions. For example, how exactly do you expect another
sovereign nation to pay for a wall? Are you willing to enter a war for your
wall? Do you realize some of your claims are in explicit disagreement with The
Universal Declaration of Human Rights? I keep hoping that eventually people
will realize that Trump’s claims are absolutely ridiculous, but I have been
consistently surprised by the widespread acceptance for his claims. The only
hope is that rationality will lead them to question their candidate’s
legitimacy.
Trump is actually what I've been writing my papers on for this class. He is the perfect example of illiberalism. His success in the media, be it ridicule or praise has definitely been a large part of his success. He has mastered the art of campaigning through outrageous statements that capture people's attention. People praise him for not worrying about being politically correct, and being straightforward, but it's hard to deny that he also has racist, sexist, and xenophobic tendencies. I agree that rationality is perhaps the way to deal with this, as much of his statements don't have any truth value to them. If more people looked at him through a lens of rationality, Trump would be much less popular.
ReplyDeleteI agree that the way to look at Trump, is as an entertainer. Earlier today he linked JFK's assassination to Ted Cruz's father. At 1st I thought it was all a joke, but then I read the transcript from the interview. After Ted Cruz drops out of the presidential, Trump is all of a sudden in a good mood and labels Cruz "one hell of a competitor" and acknowledged he’s “got an amazing future.” That was the nicest thing Trump has said about his former rival in months, and its not a coincidence that he said it after Cruz drops out. If Trump does indeed win the presidential election, we the people can exercise our right of revolution. John Locke states that it is the right or duty of the people of a nation to overthrow a government that acts against their common interest. I believe the American people should unite an vote for the Democratic nominee, if the majority of them do not desire Trump as president.
ReplyDelete